You might not be thinking too much about the type of server your site is running on, but it’s a critical cog. It is the basis of your entire site and its performance. As such, two main types of servers often make the headlines, although NGINX vs. OpenLiteSpeed is not a straightforward decision.
In this article, we compare NGINX to OpenLiteSpeed in terms of features and performance. In the end, you will know exactly which one to choose as your server.
Presentation of NGINX and OpenLiteSpeed
Not so long ago, NGINX blew up Apache servers. The consensus is that NGINX is more flexible when it comes to the needs of a modern website.
It has a lot of strings to its bow: it’s a web server, reverse proxy, mail proxy, HTTP cache, and load balancer all in one.
NGINX is free and open source under the BSD license. This means that it is easy for web hosts to adopt. In fact, there are about 48 million sites that use NGINX as their server technology. Most hosting companies now offer NGINX servers alongside the classic Apache type.
however, OpenLiteSpeed could get what you pay for.
It’s also open source, free, and based on the company’s proprietary version. While there are fewer numbers available for the open source edition, there are only around five million sites running any version of the software.
It is a scalable web server which also comes with a dedicated caching module. It’s tempting: combined with rewrite rules compatible with Apache, it forces you to take a closer look.
NGINX vs OpenLiteSpeed: feature comparison
From NGINX, it offers low memory usage and an asynchronous event-based approach. In other words, it maximizes its processing time by working on other tasks while waiting for a process to complete. It is efficient and modern.
It also offers much more than just a web server. For example:
Although OpenLiteSpeed does not offer load balancing, it does offer full range of features:
In fact, there is a lot more than what we can cover in this article. However, it should be noted that some desirable features of LiteSpeed’s Enterprise Edition, such as WordPress brute force protection, are not available in OpenLiteSpeed. It is disappointing but does not diminish the product too much.
NGINX vs OpenLiteSpeed: performance comparison
Of course, performance is one of the most important aspects of choosing a server. It is also difficult to find unbiased opinions to make a proper comparison.
However, we can take advantage of other benchmarks to provide a well-balanced view.
For example, Cyberhosting saw an astronomical victory for OpenLiteSpeed in its testing across the board. Also WP Speed Matters website saw that OpenLiteSpeed has better Time to first byte (TTFB) and could handle more users.
You can also consult user tests, which also corroborate the results elsewhere.
Choose the right type of server
It should be noted that NGINX vs. OpenLiteSpeed is not a one-sided contest. Both have their strengths, and we would be comfortable running a site on both types of servers.
Overall, the decision will be one that meets your needs. NGINX has a high adoption rate. Many web hosting providers haven’t moved from an Apache-centric setup to a more flexible option in a long time. Over time, we might see OpenLiteSpeed become one of those options. We hope so, given the impressive performance results.
Still, OpenLiteSpeed surpasses NGINX in terms of performance. The problem is whether you can find a reputable hosting provider that has good servers that support OpenLiteSpeed.
Until then, NGINX will be fine for most average users, and it should be your go-to option, certainly compared to Apache.
In this NGINX vs OpenLiteSpeed comparison, we’ve come up with two great options. Our conclusion is that NGINX is the way to go for the average user, as it is available through more hosts. However, OpenLiteSpeed still impresses us enough that you love its performance – if you can find a supportive host.
If you want to add Secure Sockets Layers (SSL) to your NGINX server, we have the article for you. Do you think NGINX vs OpenLiteSpeed is a single horse race? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comments section below!
Is this article useful?